by Kelvin Smith
Handy for some to have another mighty resource to hand.
Their evidence-based arguments feed on validated, refereed and regulated data, while others who have a closer feel for difference and nuanced arguments experience over-publication and over-retention as something that refluxes, spills, gushes out of the printed, beyond the printed, drowning the printed, transforming what’s thought of into a polluting fluidity: flowing, foolish, flaccid, fallacious, felonious.
Monkish devotion to decoration and reproduction is displaced by monkeyish typing, terabyte upon terabyte creating a tsunami of foaming danger.
Too much access to excess.